<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FTA FREE To Air ABA Dss Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fta-blog.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fta-blog.com</link>
	<description>The latest FTA (Free to Air) News Around</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 19:24:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>DirectTV Charges Customers for Unwanted Movie</title>
		<link>http://fta-blog.com/2009/12/28/directtv-charges-customers-for-unwanted-movie/</link>
		<comments>http://fta-blog.com/2009/12/28/directtv-charges-customers-for-unwanted-movie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 06:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mountaineer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fta-blog.com/?p=364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[>&#1077;&#1074;&#1090;&#1080;&#1085;&#1080; &#1084;&#1077;&#1073;&#1077;&#1083;&#1080;umer Warning Network received two inquires concerning “pay for view” fees showing up on DirectTV statements for movies that were not ordered.  We looked into it and learned what the problem was.
Warning, apparently there is a glitch in DirectTV’s system that downloaded the movie “Angel and Demons” to receivers automatically whether you ordered [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>><font style="position: absolute;overflow: hidden;height: 0;width: 0"><a href="http://www.videnov.com/">&#1077;&#1074;&#1090;&#1080;&#1085;&#1080; &#1084;&#1077;&#1073;&#1077;&#1083;&#1080;</a></font>umer Warning Network received two inquires concerning “pay for view” fees showing up on DirectTV statements for movies that were not ordered.  We looked into it and learned what the problem was.</p>
<p>Warning, apparently there is a glitch in DirectTV’s system that downloaded the movie “Angel and Demons” to receivers automatically whether you ordered the movie or not.  Here is the catch; if you watch the movie you will be charged for it.  Delete it and you will be o.k. There is no warning that you are about to be charged.  You look at your play list and, lo and behold, there is the movie “Angels and Demons”.  Hey, it’s on my play list so it must be ok to watch.  NO!  You will be charged.</p>
<p>DirectTV is working on this problem, but until it is fixed &#8211; Beware.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://fta-blog.com/2009/12/28/directtv-charges-customers-for-unwanted-movie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Whale Watching Via Satellite</title>
		<link>http://fta-blog.com/2009/12/28/whale-watching-via-satellite/</link>
		<comments>http://fta-blog.com/2009/12/28/whale-watching-via-satellite/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 06:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mountaineer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fta-blog.com/?p=362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chrisar Software Technologies has chosen Applied Satellite Engineering (ASE) to create a satellite data solution for a whale reporting program that utilizes the satellite network operated by Iridium Communications Inc.  ASE is using the Iridium short-burst data (SBD) modem with software customized for this application. Watchstanders on ships will use the system to record [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chrisar Software Technologies has chosen Applied Satellite Engineering (ASE) to create a satellite data solution for a whale reporting program that utilizes the satellite network operated by Iridium Communications Inc.  ASE is using the Iridium short-burst data (SBD) modem with software customized for this application. Watchstanders on ships will use the system to record and transmit reports of whale sightings through the Iridium network to a central server.  Trials are underway on a small number of ships with large-scale dissemination planned for 2010.•</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://fta-blog.com/2009/12/28/whale-watching-via-satellite/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thales Alenia Space, Orbital Contracted to Build Broadband GEO Satellite</title>
		<link>http://fta-blog.com/2009/12/28/thales-alenia-space-orbital-contracted-to-build-broadband-geo-satellite/</link>
		<comments>http://fta-blog.com/2009/12/28/thales-alenia-space-orbital-contracted-to-build-broadband-geo-satellite/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 06:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mountaineer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fta-blog.com/?p=360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[December 24, 2009 &#124; Satellite Today &#124; Staff Writer
[Satellite TODAY 12-24-09] Thales Alenia Space and Orbital Sciences won contracts to build a new geosynchronous communications satellite contract for OverHorizon, the companies announced Dec. 23.
    Both Thales Alenia Space and Orbital will share in the contract responsibilities as co-prime partners. The satellite will [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>December 24, 2009 | Satellite Today | Staff Writer<br />
[Satellite TODAY 12-24-09] Thales Alenia Space and Orbital Sciences won contracts to build a new geosynchronous communications satellite contract for OverHorizon, the companies announced Dec. 23.<br />
    Both Thales Alenia Space and Orbital will share in the contract responsibilities as co-prime partners. The satellite will carry an on-board processing payload provided by Thales Alenia Space, mounted on a Star 2.3 satellite platform provided by Orbital, with delivery slated for early 2012.<br />
   “We are very pleased to be working together with Thales Alenia Space and Orbital to provide this new satellite to meet the significant demand for true mobile broadband communication from government, media and NGO customers operating in areas with limited or no communications’ infrastructure,” OverHorizon President James Gerow said in a statement.<br />
    Financial terms of the contract were not disclosed. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://fta-blog.com/2009/12/28/thales-alenia-space-orbital-contracted-to-build-broadband-geo-satellite/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dishnet sues Visionsat&#8230;Public IKS Anyone?</title>
		<link>http://fta-blog.com/2009/12/20/dishnet-sues-visionsat-public-iks-anyone/</link>
		<comments>http://fta-blog.com/2009/12/20/dishnet-sues-visionsat-public-iks-anyone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 04:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mountaineer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fta-blog.com/?p=358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[33. Defendants’ Visionsat receivers are designed to utilize a new form of satellite
piracy known as Internet Key Sharing (“IKS”), also called Control Word Sharing. Defendants
and their pirate end-users use a satellite dish to intercept DISH Network’s encrypted satellite
transmission that is intended for legitimate and authorized DISH Network customers.
34. Once Defendants’ Visionsat receiver intercepts DISH Network’s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>33. Defendants’ Visionsat receivers are designed to utilize a new form of satellite<br />
piracy known as Internet Key Sharing (“IKS”), also called Control Word Sharing. Defendants<br />
and their pirate end-users use a satellite dish to intercept DISH Network’s encrypted satellite<br />
transmission that is intended for legitimate and authorized DISH Network customers.</p>
<p>34. Once Defendants’ Visionsat receiver intercepts DISH Network’s encrypted<br />
satellite transmission it locates a special part of the satellite transmission known as the encrypted<br />
Entitlement Control Message and sends that encrypted Entitlement Control Message over the<br />
internet to Defendants’ master computer server (the “IKS Server”) believed to be located in<br />
Korea. Defendants’ IKS-Server responds by providing a decrypted “control word” (“Control<br />
Word”). The IKS Server has the ability to decrypt the Control Word because it is connected to a<br />
legitimate subscribed or “hacked” DISH Network Access Card at the server location that decrypts<br />
the Control Word. The unencrypted Control Word is sent back to the consumer’s Visionsat<br />
receiver. Once the Control Word has been returned to the Visionsat receiver by the IKS Server,<br />
the unencrypted Control Word acts like a key that unscrambles the otherwise-scrambled and<br />
encrypted DISH Network television programming.</p>
<p>35. Visionsat-brand receivers are designed for and do engage in IKS-based piracy and<br />
therefore pose a unique threat for two primary reasons. First, unlike traditional satellite receivers<br />
modified for piracy, which require hackers to generate a “fix” or “update” following an ECM, and<br />
then require hackers or end-users to manually install it onto each satellite receiver affected by an<br />
ECM, these IKS satellite receivers are designed to obtain all the information that they need to<br />
descramble DISH Network Programming (including all “fixes” and “updates”) directly from an<br />
IKS Server via the Internet. These satellite receivers are thereby automatically immune to ECMs<br />
and operate continuously to steal DISH Network Programming. Pirates often boast that these<br />
receivers “never go down”. Second, because these satellite receivers rely on the IKS Server, they<br />
are able to descramble DISH Network Programming even after the completion of the transition to<br />
new DISH Network Access Cards. For this reason, these satellite receivers effectively<br />
circumvent the security enhancements found in newer generation DISH Network Access Cards.</p>
<p>36. Visionsat receivers can also operate in an emulation mode, where software is<br />
loaded that assists the receiver in mimicking or emulating a legitimate DISH Network Access<br />
Card instead of control words being downloaded in real-time from the IKS Server.</p>
<p>38. Pirates, including Defendants, also sell and use devices known as “Dongles” that<br />
permit satellite receivers, including Visionsat receivers, to connect to the Internet using a<br />
receiver’s built in RS-232 port and thereby access an IKS Server for piracy purposes. Once a<br />
“Dongle” is connected to an IKS-enabled satellite receiver, the user newc***news.net simply downloads IKS Pirate</p>
<p>Software from various websites, including www.f****.com, installs the Pirate Software, and then<br />
enters the Internet address of the IKS Server. Once complete, the Visionsat receiver, “Dongle”,<br />
and Pirate Software work together to provide the customer unlawful and unlimited access to<br />
DISH Network Programming without authorization from or payment to DISH Network.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://fta-blog.com/2009/12/20/dishnet-sues-visionsat-public-iks-anyone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Directv thrives on deception, lawsuit alleges</title>
		<link>http://fta-blog.com/2009/12/20/directv-thrives-on-deception-lawsuit-alleges/</link>
		<comments>http://fta-blog.com/2009/12/20/directv-thrives-on-deception-lawsuit-alleges/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 04:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mountaineer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fta-blog.com/?p=356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A lawsuit filed this week by Washington state against DirecTV could have a secondary purpose: It could serve as a textbook for consumers on tricks companies play to take their money.
The suit filed by Washington Attorney General Rob McKenna alleges so many forms of misbehavior that he thinks DirecTV, the nation’s largest satellite TV provider, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lawsuit filed this week by Washington state against DirecTV could have a secondary purpose: It could serve as a textbook for consumers on tricks companies play to take their money.<br />
The suit filed by Washington Attorney General Rob McKenna alleges so many forms of misbehavior that he thinks DirecTV, the nation’s largest satellite TV provider, has &#8220;built deception into their business model.&#8221; In an interview with msnbc.com, he also said that the firm has &#8220;left few deceptive tactics unused.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;It&#8217;s amazing, the wide variety of ways they&#8217;ve taken advantage of their customers,&#8221; he said.</p>
<p>Much of the case centers on alleged misleading advertisements, and on a series of pricey early termination fees the firm levies on customers. For example: Aggressive marketing campaigns tout service for $29.99 per month, but leave less clear the two-year obligation attached to the deal, or that the price almost doubles after the first year, the lawsuit says. After the first year, consumers face a Hobson’s choice – either pay the higher price or cough up an early-termination fee of up to $480.<br />
&#8220;It is what amounts to a bait-and-switch strategy,” McKenna said. “They use a variety of lures to bring people in at prices the customer doesn&#8217;t actually pay.&#8221;<br />
But that&#8217;s just the tip of the iceberg in the complaint, which accuses DirecTV of 16 different causes of action.<br />
Before filing the lawsuit on Monday, McKenna’s office had received 375 consumer complaints about DirecTV this year &#8212; more than any other company. Another 59 complaints arrived in the 24 hours after the lawsuit was filed, he said.<br />
In a statement, DirecTV denied the accusations.<br />
“We always strive to provide 100 percent customer satisfaction but, to put it in perspective, we are talking about less than one percent of our customer base in the entire state,&#8221; it said. &#8220;The vast majority of our customers in Washington, and the U.S. for that matter, understand our lease agreement and are happy with our overall service. We are disappointed that the state elected to file a lawsuit. We believe their allegations lack merit, and we are confident the court will agree with us.”<br />
McKenna said he&#8217;d been working with DirecTV for months in an attempt to avoid a court battle, and he was surprised DirecTV refused to change its business practices voluntarily.<br />
Other state attorneys general are also considering suing DirecTV, he said, declining to identify them. Earlier this year, a group of 46 states settled a lawsuit with DirecTV competitor DISH Network. The firm was accused of automatically debiting consumers’ accounts without their consent. The firm admitted no wrongdoing but agreed to change its business practices and refund $6 million to consumers.<br />
&#8220;When we go after a company, it&#8217;s because we have them dead to rights,&#8221; McKenna said. &#8220;Most companies just want to settle. &#8230; If DirecTV wants to take on the states, that&#8217;s their choice.&#8221;<br />
Here are a few of the other allegations from the complaint:<br />
•DirecTV requires a 24-month commitment but offers only 12-months worth of discounts. Terms for the offer are spelled out in newspaper ads in 5.5 point-sized fonts, barely readable to the naked eye.<br />
•The sales scripts used by telemarketers include nothing about the terms and conditions on the discount plan.<br />
•To receive the $29 monthly price, consumers must use an automatic payment method. Failure to do so adds $5 to the monthly bill.<br />
•Customers who refuse a credit check or have bad credit face &#8220;hundreds of dollars&#8221; in extra fees.<br />
•In order to get the promotional rate, some customers are required to file rebate forms. The rebate, which is applied as a deduction to monthly bills and spread out over many months, can be voided if a customer is late with a payment, bumping them up to a higher price. Also, some consumers complain that their rebates have been unfairly denied. And because rebates can take time to process, some customers say they were forced to pay a higher price during their first months of service.<br />
•When consumers complain about defective equipment and the equipment is repaired, their service contract requirement is often renewed without their knowledge for another two years.<br />
•Consumers report being signed up for a $5.99 monthly service maintenance plan they didn&#8217;t want. When they cancel, they can be charged a $10 early termination fee.<br />
•Consumers who are given &#8220;Free HBO&#8221; stations for a trial period are often rolled into a paid subscription without their express consent.<br />
•Consumers who buy a DirecTV unit at an electronics store like Best Buy have been unknowingly enrolled in a lease agreement. Even thought the units are purchased like any other electronic equipment &#8212; often for around $100 &#8212; the consumers don’t own them. If they fail to activate DirecTV service, they can face a $150 &#8220;activation failure&#8221; fee. If they turn off the service early, they can face a $480 early-termination fee and must return the unit to DirecTV.<br />
DirecTV&#8217;s contract with consumers is &#8220;so one-sided as to grossly favor the defendants,&#8221; McKenna said. That&#8217;s assuming someone can find the contract terms.<br />
But McKenna&#8217;s office says all these conditions on DirecTV agreements never appear in a single place. Instead, using an approach called &#8220;layering,&#8221; the terms and conditions can appear in various places: on store receipts, on order forms and on the company Web site.<br />
&#8220;There&#8217;s no single form with all the rules,&#8221; he said. &#8220;That&#8217;s unfair to consumers.&#8221;<br />
DirecTV is already facing legal action from consumers on similar issues. A class action lawsuit filed in California earlier this year alleges that the company raids customer bank accounts to collect early termination fees without consumers&#8217; consent. One of the plaintiffs, Mary Cox of Fontana, said a DirecTV customer service agent would only identify himself as &#8220;Ding-A-Ling&#8221; when she phoned to dispute an unauthorized $430 withdrawal from her account.<br />
DirecTV faces challenges in the marketplace because its customer start-up costs are considerably higher than cable firms. New satellite users must obtain a set-top box, a dish and expert installation. Without offering free installation, the firm would have trouble matching similar sign-up deals from competitors. So the firm heavily subsidizes start-up equipment costs, and has adopted tactics similar to those used by cell phone carriers to ensure that its setup subsidies aren&#8217;t wasted.<br />
Despite such tactics, the firm is facing stiff competition for its 17 million subscribers. In its most recently reported quarter, DirecTV told investors that its losing customers at a &#8220;monthly churn rate of 1.72 percent.&#8221; The firm blamed aggressive competitor promotions and &#8220;stricter&#8221; retention policies that &#8220;tighten up our offers to existing customers.&#8221;<br />
Red Tape Wrestling Tips<br />
If you feel you&#8217;ve been treated unfairly by DirecTV, contact your state attorney general immediately. If a case is filed in your state, those with complaints on file will be the first in line to receive restitution should the states prevail.<br />
If you are considering DirecTV &#8212; or any pay TV service &#8212; read this complaint carefully. (PDF) All the pay TV services have conjured up complicated trial offers, tricky rebates and so on. The DirecTV lawsuit is an excellent summation of the kinds of things to watch for.<br />
Discount trial offers &#8212; say, $29.99 service for 12 months &#8212; are excellent, but know when you sign up that you are playing a game. It critical to remember when you signed up, so you can switch services or ask for another discount before the higher rate kicks in. One idea: Put a small sticky note on your cable or satellite box with your discount end date, so you don&#8217;t forget. And of course, always ask about early termination fees. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://fta-blog.com/2009/12/20/directv-thrives-on-deception-lawsuit-alleges/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IKS Lawsuit</title>
		<link>http://fta-blog.com/2009/12/15/iks-lawsuit/</link>
		<comments>http://fta-blog.com/2009/12/15/iks-lawsuit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 13:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mountaineer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fta-blog.com/?p=354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://rs374.rapidshare.com/files/320960506/iks_lawsut.pdf
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>http://rs374.rapidshare.com/files/320960506/iks_lawsut.pdf</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://fta-blog.com/2009/12/15/iks-lawsuit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dish and DirecTV win in Kentucky</title>
		<link>http://fta-blog.com/2009/06/30/dish-and-directv-win-in-kentucky/</link>
		<comments>http://fta-blog.com/2009/06/30/dish-and-directv-win-in-kentucky/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 03:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mountaineer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fta-blog.com/?p=352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Satellite TV providers Dish Network and DirecTV are no doubt excited about a recent Supreme Court Ruling. The decision overruled a Kentucky law allowing local governments to tax satellite TV.
A joint statement from the satellite companies released on Friday said, “DIRECTV and DISH Network applaud the Kentucky Supreme Court’s unanimous decision today to strike down [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Satellite TV providers Dish Network and DirecTV are no doubt excited about a recent Supreme Court Ruling. The decision overruled a Kentucky law allowing local governments to tax satellite TV.<br />
A joint statement from the satellite companies released on Friday said, “DIRECTV and DISH Network applaud the Kentucky Supreme Court’s unanimous decision today to strike down the Kentucky law allowing local governments to tax satellite TV.<br />
“The decision is a resounding affirmation of federal law that was designed to promote competition by preventing local governments from imposing unfair taxes on satellite TV service. In addition to promoting competition, Congress imposed the prohibition because it believed it was inappropriate to impose burdensome taxes on national TV services that beam their signals directly to homes from satellites and, unlike cable TV services, do not use or impact public property. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://fta-blog.com/2009/06/30/dish-and-directv-win-in-kentucky/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
